Six Inch Reflector Telescope Best Uses I Need Good Telescope For Viewing Planets?
I need good telescope for viewing planets? - six inch reflector telescope best uses
Hello. I want to make good a telescope is available for viewing planets and my budget is $ 280. I have some questions. A refractor or reflector is better when it comes to the planet? I know that the main obstacle in one place, but problems in the six-inch telescope, which can still cause problems? I get also an equatorial mount? I know it is very useful when a sharp increase in their vision, but too expensive compared to Dobson. Covers Dobsons also be difficult to follow the planet with a Dob? I thought, at the Orion SkyQuest XT6. Do you know whether it is a good development opportunities for the planet? A reply would be appreciated. Thank you.
|
5 comments:
Taking into account your budget, I believe, the XT6 is a good choice. The same amount of money will buy a telescope only half as big, and you will see a lot less with him. In any case, the reputation of the telescope is largely on the quality of the end of the main ways in which a 6 "platform, you can back down 10,000 U.S. dollars.
The effect of central obstruction in the majority of salamanders is small and occurs mainly in multinational companies, which tend to about 40% of the opening. The main change in the eyes of a salamander is the diffraction from the spider, and you can live with. Some refractors astrophotographers with fancy chains, even before their lenses are to get as cool effect of the Cross in its images of stars!
There is a tendency for newcomers to astronomy, the usefulness of the equatorial mount, and to overestimate the difficulty of the date of birth. The postponement of the date of birth is not difficult on the course and quickly becomes a reflex. Mounts are cumbersome and costly, and some people even confusing.
The first answer is correct. Am I completely agree. To maximize your investment with a Newtonian reflector. 6 inches is much better than a 4.5-inch Dobsonian mount for visual observing large and is more stable than other devices, unless you spend much, much more than your budget. And most of its investment here is the optical quality. Refractors are good, but lack of transparency and less to a resolution of 80 mm or more, double the price or more for ED Apochromat Refractor or maintain! Newton has no color, if your wrong in a defective lens. There is a long discussion about the fact that I can post here. If you have limited experience with telescopes, is the perfect choice. You need a pair of eyes. Have plants that are not really short, as in the high-power 8mm. After a good price for the middle range. Get a good 2x Barlow, who want more power. Get Astronomy Club Star Party and look through some of the smaller regions. Nothing in the frame of 80 mm or 3 inches is useful to see except in only 4 moons of Jupiter and the ring around Saturn. It Look in the sun! Unless! You have to sell a solar filter for your scope like the Orion and others. And do not let its scope in the sun or unattended, when the sun is prescribed. Someone can look through the scope, or even through the viewfinder and permanent damage to the eyes in an instant.
In the first place I suggest to enter on the network "used telescopes for sale to achieve." While the glass is good, is an area used new opportunities. My first area is used, the 6-inch reflector that works well over 30 years and has very good and only cost me $ 100.00. You get more for your money.
The first answer is correct. Am I completely agree. To maximize your investment with a Newtonian reflector. 6 inches is much better than a 4.5-inch Dobsonian mount for visual observing large and is more stable than other devices, unless you spend much, much more than your budget. And most of its investment here is the optical quality. Refractors are good, but lack of transparency and less to a resolution of 80 mm or more, double the price or more for ED Apochromat Refractor or maintain! Newton has no color, if your wrong in a defective lens. There is a long discussion about the fact that I can post here. If you have limited experience with telescopes, is the perfect choice. You need a pair of eyes. Have plants that are not really short, as in the high-power 8mm. After a good price for the middle range. Get a good 2x Barlow, who want more power. Get Astronomy Club Star Party and look through some of the smaller regions. Nothing in the frame of 80 mm or 3 inches is useful to see except in only 4 moons of Jupiter and the ring around Saturn. It Look in the sun! Unless! You have to sell a solar filter for your scope like the Orion and others. And do not let its scope in the sun or unattended, when the sun is prescribed. Someone can look through the scope, or even through the viewfinder and permanent damage to the eyes in an instant.
Taking into account your budget, I believe, the XT6 is a good choice. The same amount of money will buy a telescope only half as big, and you will see a lot less with him. In any case, the reputation of the telescope is largely on the quality of the end of the main ways in which a 6 "platform, you can back down 10,000 U.S. dollars.
The effect of central obstruction in the majority of salamanders is small and occurs mainly in multinational companies, which tend to about 40% of the opening. The main change in the eyes of a salamander is the diffraction from the spider, and you can live with. Some refractors astrophotographers with fancy chains, even before their lenses are to get as cool effect of the Cross in its images of stars!
There is a tendency for newcomers to astronomy, the usefulness of the equatorial mount, and to overestimate the difficulty of the date of birth. The postponement of the date of birth is not difficult on the course and quickly becomes a reflex. Mounts are cumbersome and costly, and some people even confusing.
Post a Comment